VII.] DISCUSSION OF THE DATA OF STATURE. 99

the results in detail. They seem to show a Regression of about two-fifths, which differs from that of one-third in the ratio of 6 to 5. This direct observation is so inferior in value to the inferred result, that I disregard it, and am satisfied to adopt the value given by the latter, that is to say, of one-third, to express the average Regression from either of the Parents to the Son.

b. Mid-Parental : The converse relation to that which we have just discussed, namely the relation between the unknown stature of the Mid-Parent and the known Stature of the Son, is expressed by a fraction that is very far from being the converse of two-thirds. Though the Son deviates on the average from P only 2 - as widely as his Mid-parent, it does not in the least follow that the Mid-parent should deviate on the average from P, I or 11, as widely as the Son. The Mid-Parent is not likely to be more exceptional than the son, but quite the contrary. The number of individuals who are nearly mediocre is so preponderant, that an exceptional man is more frequently found to be the exceptional son of mediocre parents than the average son of very exceptional parents. This is clearly shown by Table 11, where the very same observations which give the average value of Filial Regression when it is read in one way, gives that of the Mid-Parental Regression when it is read in another way, namely down the vertical columns, instead of along the horizontal lines. It then shows that the Mid-Parent of a man deviates on the

x2